Thomas Friedman has a well-reasoned piece in today’s New York Times that evaluates the current operations in a different light from many of the other articles we’ve seen.  (Specifically differing, as he notes, in his analysis of the 2006 war in Lebanon.)  The result: some interesting ideas for how to proceed.

An excerpt:

Israel de facto recognizes Hamas’s right to rule Gaza and to provide for the well-being and security of the people of Gaza — which was actually Hamas’s original campaign message, not rocketing Israel. And, in return, Hamas has to signal a willingness to assume responsibility for a lasting cease-fire and to abandon efforts to change the strategic equation with Israel by deploying longer and longer range rockets. That’s the only deal. Let’s give it a try.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.